Sometimes you have to debunk, Thomas? I thought this was a gadget news site, not a rumor overlord site. Why would Engadget have any concern one way or another on such a petty rumor? It's sad that you feel it more important to participate in Apple rumors for revenue than to stick to your original mission.
Imagining a 16GB iPhone isn't hard; what would be newsworthy would be a ship date.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
craig @ Oct 15th 2007 10:34AM
Sometimes you have to debunk, Thomas? I thought this was a gadget news site, not a rumor overlord site. Why would Engadget have any concern one way or another on such a petty rumor? It's sad that you feel it more important to participate in Apple rumors for revenue than to stick to your original mission.
Imagining a 16GB iPhone isn't hard; what would be newsworthy would be a ship date.