lol. it better not be beige or else i'm gonna throw up.
i'm seeing a good future for HD DVD even though i'm a natural blu-ray supporter. VHS won because it was cheaper, not because it was more technologically advance.(well there was also the reason that VHS had better LP and EP settings.)
i would only store HD movies on a blu-ray disk, not data, (which means the amount of storage matters little to me) given that there are more blu-ray players out there than PC drives. I would use AIT-5 tape storage with native capacity of 400GB (more or less 1TB when compressed), although the price is steep at $2500 per drive. (i don't know how much a tape cost). btw, AIT-6 with 800GB of storage is coming Q1/Q2 2007, if all goes well.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
icepop4who @ Jan 5th 2007 9:10AM
lol. it better not be beige or else i'm gonna throw up.
i'm seeing a good future for HD DVD even though i'm a natural blu-ray supporter. VHS won because it was cheaper, not because it was more technologically advance.(well there was also the reason that VHS had better LP and EP settings.)
i would only store HD movies on a blu-ray disk, not data, (which means the amount of storage matters little to me) given that there are more blu-ray players out there than PC drives. I would use AIT-5 tape storage with native capacity of 400GB (more or less 1TB when compressed), although the price is steep at $2500 per drive. (i don't know how much a tape cost). btw, AIT-6 with 800GB of storage is coming Q1/Q2 2007, if all goes well.
Nick @ Jan 5th 2007 11:28AM
VHS won the consumers.. Beta won the professionals. People act as if Beta doesnt exist anymore. All of the masters that we store are DigiBeta.